From 984cdc0650d104848804c1974c9e3e6edfb1cb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al <albarrentine@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 23:25:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [osm/polygons] From benchmarking it seems to make sense to
 keep OSM polygons in memory after all

---
 scripts/geodata/polygons/reverse_geocode.py | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/geodata/polygons/reverse_geocode.py b/scripts/geodata/polygons/reverse_geocode.py
index 6243b0c8..e956afb3 100644
--- a/scripts/geodata/polygons/reverse_geocode.py
+++ b/scripts/geodata/polygons/reverse_geocode.py
@@ -434,9 +434,6 @@ class QuattroshapesReverseGeocoder(RTreePolygonIndex):
 
     PRIORITIES_FILENAME = 'priorities.json'
 
-    persistent_polygons = True
-    cache_size = 100000
-
     sorted_levels = (COUNTRY,
                      ADMIN1_REGION,
                      ADMIN1,
@@ -651,8 +648,6 @@ class OSMReverseGeocoder(RTreePolygonIndex):
 
     polygon_reader = OSMAdminPolygonReader
 
-    persistent_polygons = True
-    cache_size = 1000000
     simplify_polygons = True
 
     include_property_patterns = set([